When Do Customers Mention This Competitor?
- "We use DocuSign, contracts run through it."
- "We are in the Adobe ecosystem, Acrobat Sign is enough."
- "E-signature is a separate service, what does it have to do with the platform?"
- Legal/procurement is used to envelope-based subscriptions; the invoice grows as volume grows.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Axis | DocuSign / Adobe Sign | 361 Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Business model | Paid SaaS per envelope/transaction (variable list price) — cost grows with usage | Built into the platform — no per-envelope fee |
| Signature types | Electronic signature; extra integration for qualified signatures | PAdES / Adobe-compatible digital signature + HSM/server-side signing + mobile signature (MSSP, ETSI TS 102 204) |
| Mobile signature (TR) | None / requires an integrator | All three GSM operators ready: Turkcell, Vodafone, Türk Telekom adapters |
| Verification | In-service only | Signature verification + timestamping + revocation checks built-in |
| Workflow | External connection via API/webhook — documents leave the platform | Signing step is a natural part of the entity workflow; the "Sign" button lives on the form surface |
| Audit trail | Separate service logs | Unified with the record: who signed what, when, with which method — one audit trail |
Objection Handling
| Objection | Response |
|---|---|
| "DocuSign is legally accepted everywhere" | So is qualified e-signature — and 361 supports PAdES + mobile signature with full verification and timestamping. |
| "Our volume is small" | Then the built-in capability costs you nothing extra — and it is already integrated with your contracts and approvals. |
| "Integration effort" | There is none: signing is a workflow step you design in the state machine — no API project. |
See 361 on your own data
Send your first document for signature inside a workflow — 2-week free POC.
2-Week Free POC →